Cocoa Butter Product To Remove Dark Marks

fucks COMPLAINT! The IACP

Umberto Eco calls them "dwarves", small pieces Armando Massarenti Sole 24 Ore has published on a weekly basis, just to remember that these nano-products. The main problem-Eco-points is, paradoxically, the need to express in a few words in longer, rather than treated with less long.

My difficulty is, however, to try to talk about a subject so vast, so much debated, too delicate, too messed up ... out of all proportion censored.

Yes, I will try to speak of freedom, the freedom that we have or give to others expression.

To do this I want to start from one of the "dwarf" philosophical Massarenti entitled "Laws of physics and freedom", with great nonchalance that seeks to generate doubt in any reader rather than give some clarification, perhaps because " philosophy is that speech that poses only questions for which there is no answer "(cited in Eco.)

" Water boils at 100 degrees, the reality is made of atoms, DNA is the basis of life. These statements relate to the realm of knowledge. As throughout history have made new discoveries: it is understood that the earth revolves around the sun, and then came Kepler, Newton, Einstein, and so on. Some of these findings are based on seemingly arbitrary assumptions. They will also be arbitrary, but that hypothesis productive! The real engine of objectivity. Think of the blind alleys of Aristotelian physics, which does not fully develop inertia. Let
values. Abolition of torture and the death penalty, the principle of separation of powers, free elections, universal suffrage, liberalism, tolerance and religious politics all sophisticated and complex ideas, but over time has passed, in fact, that seemed insurmountable objections . They too have been discovered in a certain time in a certain place. But once he's understood the scope, it is not abandoned. In our daily discussions we refer to them when we still want something to balance. Are fundamental discoveries, which look like much, power and fertility, that the principle of inertia. And sometimes even that hot water. "(Cited Massarenti)

The question that springs to mind is: talking about freedom, we have a real chance for something to anchor the balance?

Photo of Sonia Russo

A fixed point could perhaps be our Constitution, Article 21, we are just meeting: "Everyone has the right to freely express their thoughts through speech, writing or any other means of communication. The press can not be subjected to authorization or censorship. [...] ". But when you try to change it or over it by creating new laws that go to annul the sacred principles?! Alas, even that would embody certain.

When, turning on the TV, we realize that five of the six major television networks are under the control of the Prime Minister, the heart darkening. Without even having to mention names as that belongs to you, Enzo Biagi, Santoro or speak Veline, tronista and suitors, does not matter to list the rest, we understood each other. First plan which have little news to real news that do nothing but encourage and nurture generations of insensitive.

Italian television has always been subject to censorship in the 50s and 60s in the transmission of RAI, which then provided the only channel accessible by the population, were FORBIDDEN words like lover, birth, defect, virginity, thalamus, an embrace, considered inappropriate language television era. It was unthinkable political satire: they were turned away from the big screen brilliant minds such as Dario For, in the '80s Leopoldo Mastelloni torpiloquio was accused of blasphemy for having run a music broadcast during the Blitz and his exile continues today. The sequel is not history but current events: the prime minister Berlusconi accused of television presenters constantly changing criminal. Broadcasts were suspended as Raiot, whose presenter, Sabrina Guzzanti, was accused of doing a satire too hard against the center-right politicians, was prevented comedian Paolo Rossi on television to present a song dating back to Pericles 2500 years ago, considered dangerous for the honor of our Prime Minister. In short, we face one of the many paradoxes, given the openness that we believe there is in this new millennium and the annulment of certain taboos.

Photo of Sonia Russo

more than sixty years have passed since the fall of Fascism, but it seems rather to go back in time. The word censorship is still in fashion, it eliminates what is always uncomfortable, and if not to censure others, we are afraid to say what we think, without being deployed. This leads to approval of thought, a typical conformation of those who make public only if it considers that its views are widely distributed, and the public becomes only the dominant opinion. It gives rise to the phenomenon that sociologists call "spiral of silence "that is strong get even stronger, which is weak but tends to fade even more.

is the freedom of expression which is the basis of democracy and every citizen has the right and duty to have a say. We must therefore make us campaigners for the freedom and support are always those who day by day, boldly fought for it and not being silenced. Perhaps

reflections trivial, trite and hackneyed, my, but there is nothing so little solid. This boat is leaking from all sides and more rapidly sinking, swallowed by a vortex of ignorance.

As in these photos, someone stop the mouth prevents us from feeling, but on the other hand, there are images that we see, images of freedom, screams can break down any wall.

"[...] in such cases must censor, on what basis we work to ensure that arrivals
's ear of the people [...]
[...] refuses to mince words, who do you fight the dark, screaming your rage,
and fuck censorship! "(cited in Article 31)

Epiphany Earley